Magnetic Variations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In a letter received from Samuel H. Jack, C. E.: of Cecil county, Md., he states he has made careful observations to determine the true meridian for that place, and has found it to differ from what it should be by E. Loomis' map of magnetic variation in the United States. He made his observations as directed hy Prof. Gillespie's work on surveying, and found the magnetic variation to be 3 30. This is the same as that set down in the map referred to, in ]840; and as the variation at that place has amounted to 3 a year for thirty years, it should be 4 21' now. In making surveys, Mr. Jack should do so upon a meridian established by his own observations; but in making public reports of his labors, he should state this clearly, and the difference between it and the map in question.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 18This article was published with the title “Magnetic Variations” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 18 (), p. 142
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01091858-142d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe