A Major Study Speeds Food-Allergy Treatments

A major study moves food-allergy treatments a step closer to reality

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As many as eight out of every 100 children in the U.S. suffer from food allergies, a rate that rose 18 percent between 1997 and 2007. Although some outgrow these reactions, many are plagued for life with symptoms that range from a tingling, itchy mouth to tightening airways and a potentially fatal drop in blood pressure.

Until now, the only way to prevent allergic reactions has been to avoid the offending foods, which can be difficult because traces of nuts, wheat and dairy lurk in many products. But a new study offers some of the best evidence that doing just the opposite—exposing patients to higher and higher doses of a food allergen—may help some overcome their sensitivity. In the largest placebo-controlled trial of its kind, Wesley Burks, a professor of pediatrics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, and his colleagues started 40 children with egg allergies on a dose of egg white powder equivalent to one ten-thousandth of an egg. The researchers, who published their findings in July in the New England Journal of Medicine, ramped up the dose, and after 22 months of therapy followed by a two-month break, 28 percent of the children were able to eat the equivalent of two and a half eggs. One year later 100 percent of those children were eating eggs and reporting no reactions. The approach, called oral immunotherapy, follows the same principle as shots for airborne allergens, although shots may be less safe for food allergies.

Researchers believe the treatment, which has also been tested for peanut and milk allergies, “teaches” the body to tolerate what it once rejected. Blood tests in children who responded to the trial showed decreased levels of the antibody IgE, which triggers the immune response, and increased levels of IgG4 antibodies, which discourage inflammation. Those who failed the egg tests may need a longer therapy period, Burks says, or they may be too sensitive to respond to therapy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A synthetic antibody might help those extrasensitive patients by binding (thus eliminating) free IgE in the blood. It is already approved for airborne allergies and is currently in trials for oral immunotherapy. Burks says, “The hope is that we can come up with a treatment in the next few years.”

FURTHER READINGS AND CITATIONSScientificAmerican.com/oct2012/advances

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 4This article was published with the title “The Exposure Cure” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 4 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1012-16

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe