New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

A Major Study Speeds Food-Allergy Treatments

A major study moves food-allergy treatments a step closer to reality

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

As many as eight out of every 100 children in the U.S. suffer from food allergies, a rate that rose 18 percent between 1997 and 2007. Although some outgrow these reactions, many are plagued for life with symptoms that range from a tingling, itchy mouth to tightening airways and a potentially fatal drop in blood pressure.

Until now, the only way to prevent allergic reactions has been to avoid the offending foods, which can be difficult because traces of nuts, wheat and dairy lurk in many products. But a new study offers some of the best evidence that doing just the opposite—exposing patients to higher and higher doses of a food allergen—may help some overcome their sensitivity. In the largest placebo-controlled trial of its kind, Wesley Burks, a professor of pediatrics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, and his colleagues started 40 children with egg allergies on a dose of egg white powder equivalent to one ten-thousandth of an egg. The researchers, who published their findings in July in the New England Journal of Medicine, ramped up the dose, and after 22 months of therapy followed by a two-month break, 28 percent of the children were able to eat the equivalent of two and a half eggs. One year later 100 percent of those children were eating eggs and reporting no reactions. The approach, called oral immunotherapy, follows the same principle as shots for airborne allergens, although shots may be less safe for food allergies.

Researchers believe the treatment, which has also been tested for peanut and milk allergies, “teaches” the body to tolerate what it once rejected. Blood tests in children who responded to the trial showed decreased levels of the antibody IgE, which triggers the immune response, and increased levels of IgG4 antibodies, which discourage inflammation. Those who failed the egg tests may need a longer therapy period, Burks says, or they may be too sensitive to respond to therapy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A synthetic antibody might help those extrasensitive patients by binding (thus eliminating) free IgE in the blood. It is already approved for airborne allergies and is currently in trials for oral immunotherapy. Burks says, “The hope is that we can come up with a treatment in the next few years.”

FURTHER READINGS AND CITATIONSScientificAmerican.com/oct2012/advances

About Marissa Fessenden

Marissa is a freelance science journalist in Bozeman, Montana. She was an editorial intern with Scientific American from June 2012 through June 2013. Follow on Twitter @marisfessenden

More by Marissa Fessenden
Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 4This article was published with the title “The Exposure Cure” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 4 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1012-16

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe