Make Earth Great Again!—Here's How

Political conservatives are more likely to care about the environment if climate messages focus on restoring the planet to its past state, a study shows

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Political conservatives become more open to environmentalism after seeing climate change messages rooted in nostalgia, found a new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

Researchers at the University of Cologne in Germany ran several experiments with self-identified liberals and conservatives to evaluate their feelings about environmental conservation, depending on how the issue was presented. For example, participants were given a $0.50 donation to split between two fictional climate change charities: one that emphasized preventing future environmental degradation and one that highlighted reinstating a healthier Earth from yesteryear. In all experiments, conservatives were more willing to embrace environmentalism after confronting climate change messaging that emphasized the past (including donating more to the past-focused charity).

Credit: Amanda Montañez; Source: “Past-Focused Environmental Comparisons Promote Proenvironmental Outcomes for Conservatives,” by Matthew Baldwin and Joris Lammers, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Vol. 113, No. 52; December 27, 2016


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Matthew Baldwin, a co-author on the paper, attributes the findings to the inherent value that conservatives place on the past. For him, the experiments demonstrate the power of framing to change how people respond to information.

Others are skeptical that this insight will lead to change. Riley Dunlap, an environmental sociologist at Oklahoma State University, says the study is well executed, but he doubts that reframing climate change messages can influence conservatives—especially in today's highly polarized political arena. “If you're a good conservative, you need to be a climate change skeptic,” he says. “Global warming has joined God, guns, gays, abortion and taxes. It's part of that ideology.”

Still, Baldwin thinks that approaching climate change as a marketing problem rather than a political issue may be the key to rising above the political quagmire. “If you want to sell a product, you sit down and figure out who your audience is, and you market the product to the audience,” he says. “[My colleagues and I] don't think science is really all that much different.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe