Making a Stand

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Three years ago northern and central African nations that form the Community of Sahel-Saharan States agreed to a continent-wide belt of trees to combat the remorseless spread of the Sahara Desert. This past June they laid the groundwork for the Great Green Wall of Africa by formally adopting a two-year, $3-million initial phase for the project.

Green barriers against the Sahara have been around since the 1960s, but most have been small in scale. In contrast, the Great Green Wall will be 15 kilometers wide and will involve stretches of trees from Mauritania in the west to Djibouti in the east—a distance of some 7,000 kilometers. The aim is to protect the Sahel Belt—the dry savanna south of the Sahara—and prevent its precious arable land from desertification. The trees would also provide a source of firewood, crops and jobs. Projects to water these trees—say, by harvesting rain—could also help communities irrigate their fields all year long or even help them raise fish.

Pilot planting efforts, using local trees such as acacia (below), were scheduled to have begun in September. Funding for the entire project—perhaps its main stumbling block—still remains tentative.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 299 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Making a Stand” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 299 No. 4 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1008-34c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe