New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Making a Stand

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Three years ago northern and central African nations that form the Community of Sahel-Saharan States agreed to a continent-wide belt of trees to combat the remorseless spread of the Sahara Desert. This past June they laid the groundwork for the Great Green Wall of Africa by formally adopting a two-year, $3-million initial phase for the project.

Green barriers against the Sahara have been around since the 1960s, but most have been small in scale. In contrast, the Great Green Wall will be 15 kilometers wide and will involve stretches of trees from Mauritania in the west to Djibouti in the east—a distance of some 7,000 kilometers. The aim is to protect the Sahel Belt—the dry savanna south of the Sahara—and prevent its precious arable land from desertification. The trees would also provide a source of firewood, crops and jobs. Projects to water these trees—say, by harvesting rain—could also help communities irrigate their fields all year long or even help them raise fish.

Pilot planting efforts, using local trees such as acacia (below), were scheduled to have begun in September. Funding for the entire project—perhaps its main stumbling block—still remains tentative.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 299 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Making a Stand” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 299 No. 4 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1008-34c

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe