New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Making Stem Cells on Demand

Changing muscle into bone and regrowing organs could be the fruits of work on "dedifferentiation"

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What can a simple newt do that humans are trying to learn? The tiny amphibian can regenerate an entire lopped-off limb, or a whole organ, by taking normal, differentiated body cells--bone, skin, muscle and so on--and winding back their clocks to an undifferentiated state of stemness. Newts create these instant stem cells at the site of an injury, then immediately begin rebuilding the missing body part.

In contrast, once a mammal's cells have gone down the path of becoming bone or skin or brain cells, there is normally no turning back. They are said to be terminally differentiated. If humans could undo differentiation, though, doctors might not have to hunt for rare and elusive stem cells within the body or try to force stem cells from one tissue to regenerate tissue of another type. Instead an ordinary pancreas cell might be turned into a progenitor of the insulin-producing cells lost in Type 1 diabetes. Normal nerve cells could become a neurone factory for brain or spinal cord repair.

Investigations of this approach are just beginning, but early results are both encouraging and intriguing. Harvard Medical School's Mark Keating and his colleagues first showed in 2001 that dedifferentiation in mammals might be possible by regressing mouse muscle cells with an extract from regenerating newt limbs. They attributed the reversion to proteins in the extract having switched on one or more genes in the cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last year a group from the Scripps Research Institute also reported dediffer-entiating mouse muscle and then turning the cells into bone or fat. They used a small-molecule chemical that they found by trial and error and have named reversine, but as yet they are not sure how it worked.

Others are studying the natural environments, or niches, that stem cells usually inhabit within the body to figure out which environmental cues may tell stem cells what to do and when to do it. Allan Spradling and Toshie Kai of the Carnegie Institution of Washington have used this kind of information to control fruit-fly stem cells that normally produce the female's eggs. By manipulating niche signals, they could make the stem cells differentiate, then dedifferentiate again.

These kinds of results fuel speculation that such environmental signals may be crucial to creating and maintaining the stemness of stem cells. As Dov Zipori of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, Israel, put it in a recent review article, a stem cell may turn out to be not an entity so much as a state--one that any cell could enter under the right conditions.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe