Malaria and Cancer Cells Yield to the Same Garlic Compounds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Garlic may not ward off vampires, but scientific research indicates that it does provide a number of health benefits, exhibiting antifungal and antibacterial properties, and seeming to help lower the risk of cardiovascular disease and certain kinds of cancer. Animal studies have also shown it to fight malaria. Exactly how garlic works against such disparate foes, however, has proved somewhat difficult to understand. To that end, findings announced yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in Atlanta provide some insight. According to the report, both malaria and cancer cells succumb to the same garlic compounds.

To probe garlic's protective powers, Ian Crandall of the University of Toronto and colleagues focused on compounds called disulfides that are known to have antifungal, antibacterial and anticancer properties. The team tested 11 synthetic disulfide compounds against malaria-infected cells and cancer cells. Those that effectively combated the malarial cells, they found, also eliminated the cancer cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Crandall suspects that their shared susceptibility may stem from their dependence on what is known as the glutathione system. In this cell system, the antioxidant and detoxifier glutathione is reduced and stored for use later, when it is needed to absorb damage. Cells that rapidly reproduce, such as those afflicted by cancer or malaria, are particularly dependent on this glutathione system because toxins are natural byproducts of metabolism. As it turns out, the garlic disulfide Ajoene inhibits glutathione reduction, which can be a death sentence for malaria-infected cells and cancer cells.

Looking forward, Crandall hopes that such disulfide compounds may one day find use in the treatment of both malaria and cancer. For now, however, he and his colleagues must endure the perfume of the stinking rose while they work. "Does this stuff smell like garlic? Well, every time we open a vial of it in the lab everybody runs."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe