New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Malaria and Cancer Cells Yield to the Same Garlic Compounds

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Garlic may not ward off vampires, but scientific research indicates that it does provide a number of health benefits, exhibiting antifungal and antibacterial properties, and seeming to help lower the risk of cardiovascular disease and certain kinds of cancer. Animal studies have also shown it to fight malaria. Exactly how garlic works against such disparate foes, however, has proved somewhat difficult to understand. To that end, findings announced yesterday at the annual meeting of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in Atlanta provide some insight. According to the report, both malaria and cancer cells succumb to the same garlic compounds.

To probe garlic's protective powers, Ian Crandall of the University of Toronto and colleagues focused on compounds called disulfides that are known to have antifungal, antibacterial and anticancer properties. The team tested 11 synthetic disulfide compounds against malaria-infected cells and cancer cells. Those that effectively combated the malarial cells, they found, also eliminated the cancer cells.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Crandall suspects that their shared susceptibility may stem from their dependence on what is known as the glutathione system. In this cell system, the antioxidant and detoxifier glutathione is reduced and stored for use later, when it is needed to absorb damage. Cells that rapidly reproduce, such as those afflicted by cancer or malaria, are particularly dependent on this glutathione system because toxins are natural byproducts of metabolism. As it turns out, the garlic disulfide Ajoene inhibits glutathione reduction, which can be a death sentence for malaria-infected cells and cancer cells.

Looking forward, Crandall hopes that such disulfide compounds may one day find use in the treatment of both malaria and cancer. For now, however, he and his colleagues must endure the perfume of the stinking rose while they work. "Does this stuff smell like garlic? Well, every time we open a vial of it in the lab everybody runs."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe