New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Three Promising Vaccine Strategies against Malaria

Scientists inch closer to a vaccine against the mosquito-borne Plasmodium falciparum, the world's most lethal parasite

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This graphic originally appeared with the article "Halting the World's Most Lethal Parasite," in the November 2010 issue of Scientific American. We are posting it as background for today's announcement of good success in a phase III trial using a traditional vaccine by GlaxoSmithKline. Scroll down to see the illustration.

For decades the public health community has tried to devise a vaccine that would confer lifetime immunity against the malaria parasite and help stamp out disease. Yet the effort has always been an exercise in frustration. The complex life cycle of the parasite makes it challenging to know the best way to create an effective vaccine. But the advent of new funding and a spate of innovative ideas have changed the out­look dramatically in recent years. For the first time, a vaccine has reached late-stage clinical trials, and dozens of other ideas are in the early development stage. Three different approaches appear here. 

1. Blocking Transmission


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The vaccine, given to a person, would elicit production of antibodies that would pass into the gut of a feasting mosquito, where they would prevent the parasite from interacting with an enzyme needed for survival. Next time the mosquito bit someone, it would have no malaria parasites to transmit. 

2. Culturing Weak Parasites

To create new vaccines, researchers often take an infectious agent, weaken it in some way and then inject pieces of the organism into humans to produce an immune reaction. One company—Seattle BioMed—uses exactly this approach, irradiating parasites in the sporozoite stage, to prevent them from maturing, and then injecting parasite fragments into patients. In early human trials, this vaccine has achieved 100 percent immune protection against malaria.

3. Boosting a Traditional Vaccine

A vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline has entered late-stage clinical trials against Plasmodium falciparum, a deadly species of the parasite. An earlier version of the vaccine failed in clinical trials, but it was reformulated with a chemical, an adjuvant, that enhances the immune response. The newer version appears to reduce an individual’s chance of getting the severe form of the disease by about half, an unprecedented statistic for a malaria vaccine this close to commercial availability.

 Credit: Peter and Maria Hoey

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe