Male Great Whites Roams the Seas While the Females Stay at Home

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Great white sharks are almost mythical in their allure. But in a paper published in today's issue of Nature, scientists elucidate one more aspect of the mysterious lifestyle of the big fish: the males tend to roam between the earth's oceans to a much greater extent than previously thought, while females tend to stay closer to home.

The researchers analyzed and compared DNA from 95 sharks in two oceanic locations: waters near Australia and New Zealand and in the South African coastal zone. Maternally-inherited mitochondrial DNA from the two populations were significantly different. Genes passed on by both sexes, on the other hand, were similar, suggesting greater dispersal of the males than earlier tagging data had indicated.

"The results were somewhat of a surprise," co-author Andrew Martin of the University of Colorado, Boulder, says. "Many of us thought both male and female sharks were moving all over the place, but the mitochondrial DNA results indicates there was a significant divergence¿probably two to three million years ago¿between the sharks from Australia and New Zealand and those from South Africa."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings suggest that sharks may behave more like marine mammals than fish in terms of their mating behavior. The authors caution that the numbers of great white sharks could decline rapidly if people hunt populations that have non-roving females and low numbers of males migrating from surrounding stocks. "Management practices need to take into account the importance of breeding grounds and the connections of widely separated populations," Martin says. "A globally integrated plan of regional management would be the ideal situation."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe