Male Pregnancy May Spur Seahorse Speciation

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


No one could accuse a seahorse of being a hands-off father. That's because males are the ones that carry the young. Now findings published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggest that male pregnancy not only takes the load off female seahorses, it can also drive the development of new species.

Prevailing theory holds that new species arise primarily because geographic barriers halt the flow of genes between different populations. But a number of recent theoretical studies have suggested that so-called sympatric speciation can occur, in which different populations originate in one geographical area, but do not interbreed. In the new work, Adam G. Jones of the Georgia Institute and his colleagues studied seahorses off the coast of Perth, Australia, in which the female deposits her eggs in a male's brood pouch and he fertilizes and carries the eggs until they hatch. Using genetic analyses the researchers confirmed that the creatures tend to choose mates of a similar size (a selection process known as assortative mating). This way, neither female eggs nor male pouch space is wasted. Notes Jones, "in seahorses assortative mating appears to be a consequence of male pregnancy and monogamy."

The researchers then devised a computer model to test whether this mating regime could lead to reproductive isolation and subsequent speciation. They determined that if environmental conditions favor either very small or very large body sizes as opposed to intermediate ones, new species may arise in just tens or hundreds of generations as a result of assortative mating. Male pregnancy, the authors thus conclude, "represents an unusual form of parental care with extraordinary evolutionary consequences."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe