Man-Made "Star" Illuminates Milky Way's Mysterious Center

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On a clear night, a broad band of stars sweeps across the sky, backed by the faint, milky glow of even more stars. This is the Milky Way and on a midsummer eve the very center of it can be picked out within the Sagittarius constellation. But even on the clearest night, the earth's atmosphere obscures the true brilliance of our galaxy and astronomers have long struggled with images blurred by its mix of gases and turbulence. Now researchers have used a new laser-generated star to obtain the clearest pictures yet of the Milky Way's center.

Astronomer Andrea Ghez of the University of California, Los Angeles, and her colleagues used the 10-meter Keck 2 telescope in Hawaii, which has a laser attached to it, to observe our galaxy. The skywatchers employed the 14-watt laser to generate a fake star. By continuously imaging this false star along with the real ones, they could correct any fuzziness or other distortions introduced by the earth's atmosphere. "We used a laser to improve the telescope's vision," Ghez explains. "It's like getting LASIK surgery for the eyes, and will revolutionize what we can do in astronomy."

Ghez trained the telescope on the very center of the Milky Way in July 2004, taking pictures with an infrared camera of the supermassive black hole thought to lie there. The clarity provided by the laser allowed her team to distinguish between nearby stars and the infrared emanations of some mysterious, very hot material. This fuzzy warmth from the galactic center has puzzled scientists for 30 years and clearer observation of it has led Ghez and her collaborators to conclude that it is most likely superheated interstellar dust on the verge of falling into the black hole in the paper presenting their findings in the current issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters. "We are learning the conditions of the infalling material and whether this plays a role in the growth of the supermassive black hole," Ghez says. "The infrared light varies dramatically from week to week, day to day and even within a single hour."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The variations in such emissions could arise from particular events that generate stronger flares, the researchers speculate. Whatever the case, the false star should help guide further observation of the riddle at the center of our galaxy. "We have worked for years on techniques for beating the distortions in the atmosphere," Ghez notes. "We are pleased to report the first laser guide star adaptive optics observations of the center of our galaxy."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe