New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Map of Antarctica’s Bedrock Reveals Vulnerabilities

A new view of the frozen continent could improve predictions for sea-level rise

The western edge of the famed iceberg A-68 (top right), calved from the Larsen C ice shelf, is seen from NASA's Operation IceBridge research aircraft, near the coast of the Antarctic Peninsula region, on October 31, 2017, above Antarctica.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Where and how fast will Antarctica lose ice as the climate warms, and how much will the sea level rise as a result? To answer these questions, scientists must learn as much as possible about the vast continent—despite the challenge of accurately surveying its topography underneath all that ice. The contours of Antarctica’s bedrock help determine the behavior of glacial grounding lines, the zones where glacier ice transitions from resting on ground to floating on ocean water; if the line moves inland, a glacier loses more ice. Last December researchers published an upgraded bedrock map in Nature Geoscience, combining measurements from sources that included airborne radar, satellite, seismic and snow accumulation data. The team estimated the topography for gaps between radar measurements using a more accurate, physics-based method, and they found striking differences from older maps—for instance, prior bedrock elevation estimates in some areas were up to 2,000 meters off.

The new map reveals good and bad news about potential ice loss in different parts of the continent. “There is not much hope for West Antarctica,” says Mathieu Morlighem, the study leader and an earth system scientist at the University of California, Irvine. “But East Antarctica is a mixed picture.” The study fills in crucial knowledge gaps about the continent’s bedrock topography, says Jonathan Bamber, a glaciologist at the University of Bristol in England, who was not involved in the map project: “This is going to make our projections and simulations that much better for predicting sea-level rise.”

Credit: Katie Peek; Sources: “Deep Glacial Troughs and Stabilizing Ridges Unveiled beneath the Margins of the Antarctic Ice Sheet,” by Mathieu Morlighem et al., in Nature Geoscience; December 12, 2019

Annie Sneed is a science journalist who has written for the New York Times, Wired, Public Radio International and Fast Company.

More by Annie Sneed
Scientific American Magazine Vol 322 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Mapping the Frozen Continent” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 322 No. 3 (), p. 23
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0320-23

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe