New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Map Reveals Parts of the U.S. Northeast Most Vulnerable to a Geomagnetic Superstorm

The composition of ground rock in a area influences the likelihood of electrical blackouts from solar storms

Pitch Interactive; Source: “Extreme-Value Geoelectric Amplitude and Polarization Across the Northeast United States,” by Jeffrey J. Love et al, in Space Weather, Vol. 17, No. 3; March 2019

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A massive geomagnetic storm stunned Quebec in 1989, triggering blackouts across the province. The storm—a disturbance in Earth's magnetic field caused by a blast of charged particles from the sun—created electric currents that raced through underground power lines and overloaded the grid. Now new research suggests the composition of rock in specific regions could influence the risks from such “superstorms,” which occur about once a century.

Geomagnetic storms induce a local electric field in the ground, producing current. Geophysicist Jeffrey Love of the U.S. Geological Survey and his colleagues used sensors throughout the U.S. Northeast to determine the maximum electric field such a storm could create. By combining these measurements with storm data, they produced a map identifying areas with a higher chance of blackouts. The results were published in March in Space Weather.

Credit: Pitch Interactive; Source: “Extreme-Value Geoelectric Amplitude and Polarization Across the Northeast United States,” By Jeffrey J. Love et al., in Space Weather, Vol. 17, No. 3; March 2019


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They found that the type of rock in an area influences the strength and direction of the electric field a geomagnetic storm can create. If the rock is a good conductor, the resulting current flows easily through the ground. But if the rock is resistive, the current may travel through power lines instead, possibly threatening the grid.

Fields greater than one volt per kilometer can interfere with a grid's operation, and much stronger fields can cause blackouts. The team found that the most hazardous area is in Virginia, where fields can be as strong as 25.44 volts per kilometer during intense magnetic storms. Major cities, including New York, Boston and Washington, D.C., can also experience relatively powerful fields. These areas have metamorphic rock (which has been changed by intense heat or pressure) and igneous rock (lava that has cooled and solidified); both are electrically resistive. Other areas, such as the northwestern Appalachians, have a lot of conductive sedimentary rock, which should have lower geoelectric hazards.

The team says the findings could help communities prepare for future storms, and similar studies are planned elsewhere. “There's a lot of work going on in our industry, with help from the scientific community in various parts of the world,” says David Boteler, a research scientist at Natural Resources Canada, who was not involved in the study. He says power grids are already being designed to handle the next “100-year storm.”

Jonathan O’Callaghan is an award-winning freelance space journalist from the U.K., currently based in Bangkok, covering astronomy, astrophysics, commercial spaceflight and space exploration. His work regularly appears in publications including Scientific American, The New York Times, New Scientist and many more. Follow him on Bluesky.

More by Jonathan O'Callaghan
Scientific American Magazine Vol 321 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Stormy Space Weather” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 321 No. 2 (), p. 19
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0819-19

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe