New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mare Gives Birth to Own Clone

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A foal born earlier this year named Prometea is the first successfully cloned horse, scientists report today in the journal Nature. What is more, the horse from which the original cell material was taken--not a surrogate--gave birth to her. The birth also challenges the idea that the early success of a pregnancy depends on the mother's immune system responding to a developing fetus and placenta as something different from itself.

Cesare Galli and his colleagues at the Laboratory of Reproductive Technology in Italy engineered male and female cell lines from skin biopsies of two horses, a male Arabian thoroughbred and a female Haflinger. A total of 841 embryos were constructed using the same nuclear transfer technique that led to Dolly the sheep. Of these, 22 developed into blastocysts, or hollow spheres of 100 or so cells. The scientists then implanted 17 of the blastocysts into nine female horses, which resulted in four pregnancies. Prometea, born on May 28, 2003, was the only one to survive to full term and so far, she is in good health. "Our result adds the horse to the list of mammals that have so far been successfully cloned from an adult somatic cell," the authors note.

The legacy of championship racers and show horses could conceivably live on forever if reproducible copies are indeed feasible. The scientists conclude that "in principle, cloning could enable gelding champions [castrated horses] to contribute their genotype to future generations, as well as opening up an opportunity to verify the reproducibility of traits such as character and sporting performance."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe