Marijuana Use among Teens

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: KL after Marijuana and Youth

When the price or perceived risk of marijuana rises, teens really don't inhale, according to a new study from researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the University of Michigan. "This is the first paper that uses nationally representative data to look at the impact of price on youth marijuana use," says Frank Chaloupka, a professor of economics at UIC and director of the UIC ImpacTeen Project. The complete findings, Marijuana and Youth, are presented in a paper from Bridging the Gap, an initiative that pairs ImpacTeen with the University of Michigan's Youth Education and Society Project (YES).

To chart these trends, the paper's authors used data on marijuana prices and potency from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Office of Intelligence. For numbers on the drug's demand, they turned to the University of Michigan's annual Monitoring of the Future Survey, which is conducted among a nationally representative sample of American high school seniors. In all, they found that use fell to an all-time low between 1981 and 1992, a period in which the price of marijuana tripled, only to rise again after 1992 when the price dropped 16 percent. So, too, between 1981 and 1992, fears of the drug's harmful effects increased and then died down in the early 90s.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Earlier studies looking at trends in marijuana's popularity have taken its price into account, but they have typically relied on small, unrepresentative samples. Now the effects of price should receive greater attention. "Changes in the price of marijuana and in the perceived risk of harm from regular marijuana use contribute to an understanding of the number of teens who use marijuana," Chaloupka comments, "and underscore the usefulness of considering price in addition to more traditional determinants in future studies."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American