Marking the Corners of Streets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A correspondent complains of the neglect of the municipal authorities in cities, towns and villages to distinctly mark the names of stfeets on the edifices erected thereon. We have ourselves suffered much inconvenience from this omission when in strange localities, and we think with our correspondent that the authorities should take the matter in hand, and see that a general and thorough marking of streets' names takes place at every corner, and so distinctly and free from such obstructions as awning3, as to enable a person in an omnibus to distinguish them. There are several contiguoua blocks in this city where the old houses that had the names of the street on them have given way to magnificent edifices, having every decoration and costly ornament lavished upon their exteriors, but the trifling expenditure for the name of the street has either been thoughtlessly or wilfully neglected. If, as is suggested, there is a law passed compelling every builder who takes down the name of a street to replace it after the new building is erected, and the authorities act as before-mentioned, the difficulty complained of would be at once remedied, and strangers as well as residents, would be saved much un-Heoi B Sary annoyance and trouble.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 43This article was published with the title “Marking the Corners of Streets” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 43 (), p. 344
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07031858-344d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe