New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mars Rover Reveals Red Planet's 'Soaking Wet' Past

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The most recent data from the Mars rover Opportunity indicate that the section of the Red Planet it is studying was once soaking wet, NASA scientists announced yesterday. "We've been able to read the telltale clues the water left behind, giving us confidence in that conclusion," says principal investigator Steve Squyres of Cornell University.

Since its January 24th landing in a small crater in the Meridiani Planum region of Mars, Opportunity has been exploring its surroundings, particularly a rock outcrop on the inner slope of the crater. As the robot collected more information on the bedrock, the planet¿s watery history became clear, the NASA group says. "Liquid water once flowed through these rocks. It changed their texture, and it changed their chemistry," Squyres asserts. According to the team, four lines of evidence point to the existence of liquid water. First, small spherical objects embedded in the rock are similar to so-called concretions, which form when minerals precipitate out of water. Second, close-up shots reveal irregularly shaped holes at various angles in the rock, the imprints of crystals formed by water. Third, spectrometry analyses indicate that the rock contains enormous quantities of sulfur, which the researchers attribute to it being awash in sulfate salts, a telltale sign of liquid water. Finally, a second spectrometer detected the mineral jarosite, an iron-sulfate hydrate, in the outcrop. This mineral is found on Earth, though rarely, and is made only in the presence of water. "We believe at this place on Mars, for some point in time, this was a habitable environment," Squyres remarks. "This is the kind of place that would have been suitable for life. That doesn¿t mean life was there; we don¿t know that."

Indeed, plenty of questions about Martian water remain. Although the researchers are confident that liquid water flowed over or through the rocks, they do not yet know whether the rocks were laid down in liquid water. More detailed pictures taken in the days to come could help resolve this unknown, however. In addition, the age of the rocks Opportunity is studying cannot be determined, because the most effective methods for dating require samples to be returned to a laboratory on Earth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the coming weeks, Opportunity¿s handlers plan to explore other regions of the outcrop called Big Bend and hope to send it more than 740 meters out to a crater dubbed Endurance. Says project scientist Joy Crisp, "We need to take a close look at the outcropping, and broaden our view to get a better understanding of the geology of the region, which is about the size of Oklahoma."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe