Martian Rope Trick

NASA rewrites the book on Martian landings

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Car commercials put their vehicles in the most improbable of places: sides of cliffs, tops of rock pillars, middles of deserts. But NASA is about to outdo them all. In 2010 it plans to land a Mini Cooper on Mars--or more precisely, a rover of about the same size and weight. And it plans to do so using a procedure never before seen in spaceflight: piloting the craft to its landing site using its entry capsule like a hypersonic flying wing, then hovering above the ground and lowering the buggy down on a long rope. "They have a very cool system," comments another rover builder, Jorge Vago of the European Space Agency.

Engineers were driven to their audacious--and not entirely uncontroversial--approach by the sheer size of the $1.5-billion Mars Science Laboratory (MSL). It outweighs by more than four times the go-cart-size Spirit and Opportunity rovers now prowling the Red Planet. Its enclosing capsule, measuring 4.5 meters across, will be bigger than even the Apollo command module was (at 3.9 meters). "We will be the biggest heat shield ever to enter an atmosphere," says Adam Steltzner of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, who leads the team designing the entry, descent and landing sequence for the mission.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American