On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Constants of nature are expected to remain, well, constant, but physicists now find that the masses of protons or electrons might have varied over time. Researchers at the Free University of Amsterdam and their colleagues investigated the wavelengths absorbed by hydrogen gas irradiated with extreme ultraviolet laser beams in their laboratory. They compared it with readings taken at the European Southern Observatory in Chile from the glow of hydrogen clouds that had absorbed radiation from distant quasars, light that originated 12 billion years ago. The positions of certain wavelengths in both cases depend on the proton-to-electron mass ratio. Currently protons are roughly 1,836 times the mass of electrons. In the April 21 Physical Review Letters, the scientists reported that the proton-toelectron mass ratio has apparently decreased by one fifty-thousandth in the interval since the universe's youth.
These findings complement recent contentious observations that the fine-structure constant, which describes the overall strength of the electromagnetic force, has increased slightly.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
