Massachusetts Coal

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Prof. Hitchcock's late Geological Report on the Coal fields of Bristol, Mass., states some interesting facts. It has long been known, he says, that coal exists in Rhode Island, and the southern part ol Massachusetts. Geologists have been slow to settle its exact position in the geological scale. It is a genuine coal field *of the carboniferous series, however, and is of the same age as the great coal deposits in Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Ohio. The only difference seems to be that the Massachusetts coal field has undergone a change, occasioned by the action of the fire. The strata seem to have been subjected to lateral pressure, which has thrown them into undulations. The coal field covers an area of some five hundred square miles, and has been wrought in fifteen or twenty different localities, but generally without a remunerating profit. In the instance of the Mansfield Coal and Mining Company, a shaft of ten feet in diameter has been sunk to the depth of 171 feet, at the bottom of which they have driven a tunnel laterally to the distance of over 700 feet, with branches and other tunnels of an equal distance. In sinking the shaft and driving the tunnel, they passed through sixteen or seventeen layers, of coal, varying from one to seven feet in thickness. From one of the tunnels 2,500 tons of anthracite coal of a fair qua-1 ity have been extracted, although the Company have sunk in the operations $100,000. There are three modes of ascertaining the existence of coal iu a series of strata. One of these only has been employed in Massachusetts, viz. : that of sinking a shaft and then carrying tunnels across the strata. The second method is to cut a trench through the loose deposits over the rocks, and the third is by boring. The people in Massachusetts know but little about the expenses which some of the proprietors of the coal mines in England have incurred in sinking shafts to the depth of 1Q0 fathoms (600 feet), and there is one which, if we recollect aright, is 1200 feet deep.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 30This article was published with the title “Massachusetts Coal” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 30 (), p. 234
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04091853-234a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe