Massive Black Hole's Missing Ring of Dust Baffles Astronomers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: GEMINI OBSERVATORY

Some galaxies may have torus envy, if a new study is any indication. The most sensitive imaging yet of nearby galaxy M87's core reveals that the black hole residing there has either a nonexistent or much fainter ring of dust around it compared with its peers. Scientists had thought that these rings were key features of such highly energetic galaxies. The puzzling finding appears today in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

The current model of active galaxies such as M87 posits that each one harbors at its center a black hole many millions or even billions of times more massive than our own sun, all packed into a space about the size of our solar system. A disk of gas and dust drawn in by the black hole pours x-rays and ultraviolet radiation outward, where they strike a cooler layer of material, the torus, making it glow in the infrared. Everything should get bigger as the black hole gets bigger, team member Eric Perlman of the University of Maryland comments.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But when the astronomers trained the Gemini North Telescope in Hawaii onto M87, scanning it for infrared emissions, they found evidence of at best a meager torus¿one that, if there at all, is at least 1,000 times fainter than that of Centaurus A, another, less powerful active galaxy. "That was a big surprise, [to find out] it was that much fainter," Perlman says. "What I think this means is there's a lot more variety in active galaxies than we thought." A previous study hinted that M87's torus might be a little weak, he notes, but it didn't have the sensitivity to confirm that.

At 50 million light-years away, M87 is the nearest active galaxy and therefore an astronomer's first stop. Now study co-author Chris Packham of the University of Florida says, "We want to go out and survey more and more galaxies to see if this is a common feature, or a common nonfeature." If a number of galaxies are similar, he remarks, astrophysicists may have to revise their theories a bit.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe