Materials for Milk Pans

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


According to the experiments of M. Hinu-eber, of Moisburg, Germany, one hundred Hanover quarts of milk yielded, in tinned milk-pans, 707 Hanover lbs. of butter ; Glass, 7'04 Wooden (not painted), 6'96 ; Earthenware, 692 ; Wooden (painted), 667. According to the same experiments, there required for one ot millc ; produced bystail-feeding with tare and clover, 15-67 quarts; by pasturing, 11-84 showing that the milk obtained from cattle fed upon pastures is richer in butter than milk got from cows which have been fed in the stable with one and the same kind of plants: even a mixture of tare and clover shows an increase over clover alone.— I Poly tec. Jour. [By the above, tinned milk pans are the best for cooling milk and obtaining cream. In some dairies, however, all the milk is churned, and we should suppose that this was the best way to obtain all the butter in the milk. There is no butter in the tin, therefore, we suspect, that one vessel is just as good as another, if clean, in which to churn the milk.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 49This article was published with the title “Materials for Milk Pans” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 49 (), p. 392
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08201853-392a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe