Measuring the Universe with Cepheid Stars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Determining the expansion rate of the universe, known as the Hubble constant, is a tall order. Astronomers have approached this problem in part by studying celestial objects whose observed brightness relates in a predictable manner to their distance from us, such as the so-called Cepheid variable stars. Large and luminous, the Cepheid variables are a class of pulsating stars that regularly change in size and brightness. By measuring the period of the shifts and using the period-luminosity relationship, researchers can infer the distance of Cepheids from their luminosity. And because these stars are so bright, they can serve as distance indicators in galaxies beyond our own. For theorists to derive the Hubble constant from such distances, they must first calibrate the period-luminosity relationship--a task made difficult by the low number of neighboring Cepheids. As a result, astronomers have had to rely on indirect methods of calibration.

But no more. According to a report in this week¿s issue of the journal Nature, astronomers have for the first time measured the changing diameter of a Cepheid star directly. Using the Palomar Testbed Interferometer on Palomar Mountain in California, researchers studied the Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud--a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way. Although their results come with an uncertainty of 15 percent, the distance derived from the team¿s observations accords well with previous indications. Further work should fine-tune the results."We anticipate that over the next few years, distances to several dozen Cepheids will be determined with an accuracy of a few percent," the researchers wrote in their report, "providing a direct calibration of the Cepheid period-luminosity relation."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe