New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mechanical Leech Sucks Blood Better

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If you're like most people, the mere mention of the word "leech" makes you wrinkle your nose in disgust. But imagine having to let the parasites attach to you as part of a therapy regimen. In fact, such so-called medicinal leeches are standard tools for preventing blood clotting after reconstructive surgery. Scientists, however, may have figured out a way to one-up Nature's clot-busters: a newly developed mechanical leech sucks blood better than its living counterparts do. Moreover, it does so without the "yuck" factor.

The novel device, created by researchers at the University of Wisconsin, consists of a tiny glass shell, a vacuum and a tube that delivers the anticoagulant heparin to the affected tissue. "There's a big difference between what a real leech can do and what our mechanical leech can do," co-inventor Michael Conforti notes. "The real leech can penetrate only so deep. Our device can act at a deeper level under the skin, tapping into larger blood vessels, and treat a larger area of tissue." The mechanical leech also lacks the bacteria that some leeches can introduce during therapy.

Team member Nadine Connor sees the benefits of the blood-sucking gizmo somewhat differently, however. "Perhaps the mechanical device's biggest advantage is that it is not a leech," she remarks. "People don't want this disgusting organism hanging on their body. This added psychological stress for both patient and family members compounds an already difficult situation."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe