Mechanics' Institutes, and Mechanics Calumniated

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It is pleasing to listen to the conversation, not merely the attempt to show off, by some conceited, half-instructed disciple of a Mechanics' Institute, with his smattering of everything aad knowledge of nothing, volubly and eagerly explaning what he does not understand—one whose accent and language bespeak him" North o' the Tweed." [The above is an extract from the K New York Daily Times " of the 17th inst. It is taken from the Dublin correspondent's letter ? that paper, who makes the above slurring remark in his description of the " Dublin Ex. hibition." It is very evident that he looks upon a mechanic as an ignorant egotist, and this egotism he attributes to the teachings of Mechanics' Institutes. Education has no doubt a refining influence, but neither an education at Oxford, in England, Trinity in Dublin, or Yale in America, can make a man of sound judgment, and extensive information. There are many men who leave college complete ignoramuses respecting knowledge,— which is Jfacts well-arranged. This is no doubt owing to the kind ot professors, under whom they were educated. Every man ought to be estimated by his real worth, and not by the cut of his coat, or the tone of his voice. The men who have been taught in Mechanics Institutes have done more for Ireland than those who have been taught in her Universities ; the very Crystal Palace in Dublin exists only because a" working man of limited education—a self-made one—willed it. The great men of the world have neither been made by colleges nor mechanics' institutes. These institutions are mere aids to form the man. Shakspeare nor Burns were college bred, but Milton and Pope were.— The best artists ot America and England were not raised in college halls. It is a positive fact that nearly every one of our American painters and sculptors, dead and living, cannot be called tducated men, but well ??-formedjmen, which many college-educated men are not. The greatest engineering works inlreland were carried out by your Mechanics' Institutes' men, such as Thos. Telford, and instead of sneering at the graduate of a mechanics institute, the person who wrote the above would greatly benefit his head and heart if he would place himself for some time under such instruction as he might find in some Mechanics' Institutes that we could name.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 50This article was published with the title “Mechanics' Institutes, and Mechanics Calumniated” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 50 (), p. 397
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08271853-397c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe