On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Advances in medical care sometimes come as a result of long and thoughtful work in the laboratory. In 1916, however, medical progress came as a response to the urgent needs of the time. As the Great War raged in Europe, medicines and techniques were invented—or discarded—for helping the massive number of people wounded in war. For patients who had lost limbs or function because of war or disease, medical care became a process of helping the patient regain as much independence as possible.
Often, those in the medical field were employed mostly as an adjunct to the war effort, helping to return soldiers and horses to duty as quickly as possible, or helping to weed out individuals unfit for service in some way.
In a time of tumultuous change, medicine stumbled forward, trying to fill the needs created by wrenching events. For a longer look at the uses of medicine in war and peace, you can peruse the Scientific American Archive at ScientificAmerican.com/magazine/sa
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
