New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Medical Resident Burnout May Compromise Patient Care

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Medical residents have it rough. Their hours are long, their wages low, and many have debts from their schooling amounting to tens of thousands of dollars. Now the results of a new study indicate that these stresses can have serious consequences for doctors and patients alike. According to the findings, published today in the Annals of Internal Medicine, a high degree of burnout exists among residents, many of whom report providing sub-optimal patient care at least once a month.

Tait D. Shanafelt, now at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and colleagues mailed surveys aimed at assessing burnout to the 151 eligible residents in the University of Washington Affiliated Hospitals Internal Medicine Residency program in February 2001. Analyses of the 115 completed surveys revealed that 76 percent of the responding residents suffer from burnout, which the authors characterize as "a syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and perceived low personal accomplishment." These residents, they found, were two to three times more likely than their non-burned-out counterparts to report giving sub-optimal patient care--such as discharging patients early to reduce their workload, or making medical errors--monthly or weekly. More than half of the burned-out residents said they were not happy with their career choice.

The results of a survey of residents in all 415 internal medicine residency programs in the U.S. provided additional insight. Virginia Collier of the Christiana Care Health System in Newark, Del., and colleagues announce in the same issue that 42 percent of 4,128 participants in that survey had educational debt of at least 50,000 dollars; 35 percent reported experiencing four or five symptoms of depression during residency; 61 percent reported becoming more cynical.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Collier's team acknowledges that the results of their survey probably do not represent a statistically accurate sampling. But "even if we assume that only discontented, maladjusted, or financially distressed residents returned the survey," they write, "the absolute number of internal medicine residents reporting significant problems must serve as a serious alert to all concerned with our medical educational system and demands remediation."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe