Medical Resident Burnout May Compromise Patient Care

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Medical residents have it rough. Their hours are long, their wages low, and many have debts from their schooling amounting to tens of thousands of dollars. Now the results of a new study indicate that these stresses can have serious consequences for doctors and patients alike. According to the findings, published today in the Annals of Internal Medicine, a high degree of burnout exists among residents, many of whom report providing sub-optimal patient care at least once a month.

Tait D. Shanafelt, now at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and colleagues mailed surveys aimed at assessing burnout to the 151 eligible residents in the University of Washington Affiliated Hospitals Internal Medicine Residency program in February 2001. Analyses of the 115 completed surveys revealed that 76 percent of the responding residents suffer from burnout, which the authors characterize as "a syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and perceived low personal accomplishment." These residents, they found, were two to three times more likely than their non-burned-out counterparts to report giving sub-optimal patient care--such as discharging patients early to reduce their workload, or making medical errors--monthly or weekly. More than half of the burned-out residents said they were not happy with their career choice.

The results of a survey of residents in all 415 internal medicine residency programs in the U.S. provided additional insight. Virginia Collier of the Christiana Care Health System in Newark, Del., and colleagues announce in the same issue that 42 percent of 4,128 participants in that survey had educational debt of at least 50,000 dollars; 35 percent reported experiencing four or five symptoms of depression during residency; 61 percent reported becoming more cynical.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Collier's team acknowledges that the results of their survey probably do not represent a statistically accurate sampling. But "even if we assume that only discontented, maladjusted, or financially distressed residents returned the survey," they write, "the absolute number of internal medicine residents reporting significant problems must serve as a serious alert to all concerned with our medical educational system and demands remediation."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe