New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Medical Residents Overworked Despite New Work Limits

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Young doctors in their first year out of medical school regularly toil beyond highly publicized new limits on their working hours, according to newly published results from a Web-based survey. The work limits, which went into effect three years ago, were meant to address the concern that hospitals overburdened these physicians in training, or residency, thereby putting patients at risk of serious medical errors. Another survey finds that the extended hours made first-year residents more likely to jab or cut themselves with a needle or scalpel.

Working 80 to 100 hours a week or even more was long considered normal for residents, on the grounds that such training taught them to operate under stress and provide complete patient care. Of course, grueling hours also double a resident's chance of getting into a car crash and make them one third more likely to commit a serious error, studies had found. In June 2003, prompted by proposed legislation to restrict residents' hours, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education began limiting residents to 30 consecutive hours and 80 hours a week, averaged over four weeks.

Those caps were routinely violated in the ensuing year, according to a report in the September 6 Journal of the American Medical Association. Between July 2002 and May 2004, more than 4,000 participating interns from all specialties filled out monthly online work- and sleep-hour logs. Of those surveyed after the new rules took hold, 84 percent reported one or more violations after the new limits went into effect; 67 percent worked more than 30 hours consecutively at least once, and 43 percent exceeded 80 hours per week, averaged over four weeks. Around half of all monthly logs reported a violation. "Across specialties and across the country the rate of compliance has been extremely poor," says the study's lead author Christopher Landrigan, a sleep and patient safety researcher at Brigham and Women's Hospital at Harvard.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Moreover, the new work limits still leave interns at risk. A second survey found that interns were 61 percent more likely to cut or jab themselves while working 20-plus-hour shifts, with injuries occurring after an average of 29 hours. Medical culture works against the limits, explains Daniel Vo, a pediatrics intern at New York Presbyterian-Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center. After a long shift, he says, "it feels like you either haven't finished all you need to do for the patients, or you're dumping the rest of your work on your teammates."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe