Medicine Nobel Awarded to MRI Developers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Each year, doctors perform approximately 60 million magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to treat patients for a variety of ailments. Paul C. Lauterbur and Sir Peter Mansfield share this year's Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their contributions to the development of this procedure. They will split the 10 million Swedish kronor prize (about $1.3 million), which will be awarded on December 10.

The origins of MRI date back more than 70 years and the 1952 Nobel prize in physics was awarded for work that determined how atomic nuclei exposed to a strong magnetic field behave. But prior to the 1970s, scientists utilized magnetic resonance mainly to investigate the chemical structure of substances. The imaging of people relies on the fact that nearly two-thirds of the human body is water. When exposed to a magnetic field, the protons in these water molecules align themselves with the field like tiny bar magnets. Brief pulses of radiowaves allow the molecules to shift out of this alignment. After a pulse, the nuclei return to their previous state and emit so-called resonance waves, the frequencies of which are then converted into images.

The Nobel committee recognized Lauterbur (above, left), now at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, for introducing gradients in the magnetic field that made it possible to assemble two-dimensional pictures of structures that could not previously be visualized using other methods. University of Nottingham professor Mansfield (above, right) improved the speed and efficiency with which the detected signals could be analyzed and transformed into an image. In addition, he developed so-called echo-planar scanning, in which changing the gradients in the magnetic field more quickly enables extremely rapid imaging. Within a decade, the technique was being used in clinical practice, the committee notes.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe