New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Medieval Korean Records Corroborate English Observation of Sunspots

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


On December 8, 1128, John of Worcester created a colorful drawing of the Sun, the first of its kind in the world. His sketch revealed two sunspots¿dark patches on the Sun's surface that we now know are giant magnetic storms sometimes visible with the naked eye. Although accounts from China had described sunspots more than 1,000 years earlier, no one up until then had bothered to depict them.

But the Englishman wasn't the only one watching the skies at the time. Researchers from the University of Warwick and the University of Durham in England recently found a passage in the Koryo-sa¿the official Korean chronicle of the time¿that speaks of an unusual phenomenon five days after John of Worcester's observation, on December 13, 1128. Indeed, the text described a red light in the night sky above Songdo, the modern city of Kaesong.

The researchers say that although John of Worcester looked at the Sun and the Korean observer looked at the night sky, the phenomena they saw were directly linked. Sunspots occur near solar flares, which shoot particles out into space. When these particles reach Earth, they hit the thin gases of the upper atmosphere, causing auroras, which is what the Korean historian saw. And the time lapse between the appearance of large sunspots and aurora borealis at relatively low latitudes is about five days.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe