Medieval Lunar Impact Theory Is Eclipsed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

According to the medieval chronicles of a Canterbury monk, 12th-century sky watchers got an eyeful one June evening, as the new crescent moon appeared to ignite and convulse, spewing molten rock into space. Nearly 800 years later, a geologist suggested that this event fit with the location and age of one of the moon¿s youngest larger craters, Giordano Bruno. What those Canterbury folks witnessed, he proposed in 1976, was a meteor impact that created a lunar crater 22 kilometers across¿10 times as wide as northern Arizona¿s Meteor Crater. Findings reported in this month's issue of Meteoritics and Planetary Science support a different explanation, however.

Previous studies indicated that such an impact would have sent 10 million tons of space rubble into the earth's atmosphere in the days that followed. Graduate student Paul Withers of the University of Arizona decided to further probe the properties of the resulting meteor storm. "I calculate that this would cause a week-long meteor storm potentially comparable to the peak of the 1966 Leonids storm," Withers notes, adding that the shower of inch-long fragments would have been highly visible. "It would have been a spectacular sight to see," he remarks. "Everyone around the world would have had the opportunity to see the best fireworks show in history."

Yet reports of this sort of blinding storm from 12th-century witnesses are unknown. Withers thus favors a theory first put forth in 1977, which holds that an earthbound meteor created the display instead. "I think [the Canterbury witnesses] happened to be at the right place at the right time to look up in the sky and see a meteor that was directly in front of the moon, coming straight towards them," he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"It was a pretty spectacular meteor that burst into flames in the earth's atmosphere¿fizzling, bubbling and spluttering. If you were in the right one-to-two-kilometer patch on Earth's surface, you'd get the perfect geometry," Withers observes. "That would explain why only five people are recorded to have seen it."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe