Meet the Animal Masters of Illusion

Humans are not the only species to use visual trickery to their advantage

In the forests of Australia and New Guinea lives a pigeon-sized creature that is not only a master builder but a clever illusionist, too. The great bowerbird (Chlamydera nuchalis)—a cousin of crows and jays—has an elaborate mating ritual that relies on the male's ability to conjure forced perspective.

Throughout the year he painstakingly builds and maintains his bower: a 60-centimeter-long corridor made of twigs, leading to a courtyard decorated with gray and white pebbles, shells and bones. Some species also add flowers, fruits, feathers, bottle caps, acorns, abandoned toys—whatever colorful knickknacks they can find. The male takes great care to arrange the objects according to size so that the smallest pieces are closest to the bower's entrance and the largest items are farthest away.

The elaborate structure is not a nest. Its sole purpose is to attract a female for mating. Once construction is complete, the male performs in the courtyard for a visiting female, who—poised like a critical American Idol judge—evaluates the routine from the middle of the corridor. He sings, dances and prances, tossing around a few select trinkets to impress his potential mate. Her viewpoint is very narrow, and so she perceives objects paving the courtyard as being uniform in size. This forced perspective makes the choice offerings appear grander and therefore all the more enticing.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The offerings, and the male himself, appear larger than life because of an effect that visual scientists call the Ebbinghaus illusion, which causes an object to look bigger if it is surrounded by smaller objects. In 2012 ecologists Laura Kelley and John A. Endler, both then at Deakin University in Australia, confirmed that among the great bowerbirds in Queensland, how well a male generates these illusions can predict his mating success.

Visual deception is not unusual in the animal kingdom, which is perhaps why so many cultures have tales of trickster creatures—the wolf in Aesop's Fables from ancient Greece, Old Man Coyote from Plains Indian myths and Brer Rabbit stories from the Southern U.S., to name a few. As is often the case, though, reality surpasses fiction. Bowerbirds are just one of many animals that routinely employ visual duplicity to stay alive and reproduce. These adaptations support the case that illusions are not simply errors of perception but can provide significant advantages, too.

Some animals change their environment, as the bowerbird does, but many others transform their appearance or behavior to dupe a potential enemy or unsuspecting meal. Here we review the three main illusions animals use to change their looks—crypsis, masquerade and mimicry—and survey a few of the most spectacular examples of each.

Masquerade

CREDIT: TODD BANNOR Alamy (swallowtail larva); ROBERT THOMPSON Nature Picture Library (feathered thorn moth larva); ALEX HYDE Nature Picture Library (ghost mantis)

Some animals are less appealing to predators because they look like familiar inanimate or inedible objects. For instance, the larva of the giant swallowtail butterfly (Papilio cresphontes) (left) masquerades as a bird dropping, as does the orb web spider (Cyclosa ginnaga).

The larva of the feathered thorn moth (Selenia dentaria) (center) masquerades as a twig. Not only does it resemble a twig in color and shape, it also holds itself at an angle much like those of actual twigs in the host plant. Similarly, birds from the genus Nyctibius, with bark-colored plumage, masquerade as tree stumps by sitting motionless during the day.

A few species have the flexibility to match different unappetizing objects in their surroundings. Cuttlefish, like their octopus kin, have remarkable camouflaging talents and can suddenly change their skin color. They can readily disguise themselves as rocks or seaweed. Peppered moth larvae (Biston betularia) can also, chameleonlike, vary their coloration to match different twigs in their vicinity.

Some predators make use of this trick, too. The ghost mantis (Phyllocrania paradoxa) (right) masquerades as a dead leaf to fool unsuspecting flies.

Crypsis

CREDIT: FRANS LANTING Corbis

Some animals blend into their environment to go undetected by predators. This technique, called crypsis, relies on the failure of another animal to perceive the deceiver. (In contrast, masquerading and mimicking creatures are not hard to spot, but the animal that sees them miscategorizes them as another species or inanimate object.)

There are a variety of ways in which cryptic animals, such as this lichen-mimicking katydid (right), avoid detection through camouflage. Thanks to disruptive coloration and patterns in their skin or exoskeleton, many creatures effectively disappear into the background. Others also deploy cryptic behaviors, hiding in burrows or covering themselves in sediment.

Mimicry

CREDIT: PAUL STAROSTA Corbis

Eyespots—concentric circles resembling vertebrate eyes—are ubiquitous among moths and butterflies, but they can be small and marginally located or large and central. Smaller eyespots may attract a predator's attention away from the head or other vital body parts. Larger eyespots tend to look like the eyes of a predator's enemy, which suggests they serve to intimidate potential attackers.

In 2014 biologist Sebastiano De Bona of the University of Jyväskylä in Finland and his colleagues concluded that eye mimicry—rather than the conspicuousness of an eyespot—was responsible for averting predators. They showed various images on a computer screen to great tits (Parus major), birds that prey on butterflies. The photographs included owls (which prey on great tits), as well as several different butterflies. Some of these butterfly pictures featured natural-looking eyespots, others had none, and a third group showed digitally manipulated spots that had the same color contrast as real spots but looked less like eyes. The birds produced equivalent aversive responses to mimetic eyespots and to the true eyes of owls. They responded less dramatically to the modified eyes.

So-called Batesian mimics are harmless creatures that, by virtue of their sound, appearance, behavior or smell, trick predators into mistaking them for noxious or dangerous species. For example, the syrphid fly mimics the patterns and colors of the honeybee. Predators that have learned to stay away from painful stings will be motivated to leave this mimic alone.

MORE TO EXPLORE

Illusions Promote Mating Success in Great Bowerbirds. L. A. Kelley and J. A. Endler in Science, Vol. 335, pages 335–338; January 20, 2012.

Animal Visual Illusion and Confusion: The Importance of a Perceptual Perspective. L. A. Kelley and J. L. Kelley in Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 25, No. 3, pages 450–463; May–June 2014.

Predator Mimicry, Not Conspicuousness, Explains the Efficacy of Butterfly Eyespots. S. De Bona, J. K. Valkonen, A. López-Sepulcre and J. Mappes in Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, Vol. 282, No. 1806, Article No. 20150202; May 2015.

Masquerade. J. Skelhorn in Current Biology, Vol. 25, No. 15, pages R643–R644; August 3, 2015.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik
SA Mind Vol 27 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Animal Magicians” in SA Mind Vol. 27 No. 2 (), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0316-18

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe