Melting at the Top

Rapidly warming Arctic will have global consequences

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The future impact of global warming lies in the Arctic. There temperatures have risen almost twice as fast in recent decades as in the rest of the world. The Arctic Council, an intergovernmental organization comprising eight nations--the U.S., Canada, Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Russia--plus several indigenous peoples' organizations, issued a sobering report last November. It estimates that by late in this century, average Arctic winter temperatures will rise roughly four to seven degrees Celsius over land and seven to 10 degrees C over oceans, leading to profound changes by the end of the century.

Although most of the sun's energy reaches the tropics, the atmosphere and oceans redistribute the equatorial energy toward the poles. Unlike the tropics, where a large proportion of the energy received at the surface goes into evaporation, more of the energy received at the Arctic surface goes into warming the atmosphere. For several complicated reasons, including greater absorption of solar radiation, the Arctic is likely to heat up more than the Antarctic.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe