Memories of Meth Can Be Deleted

Researchers selectively erase drug-related associations in rats

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Cravings—we all have them. These intense desires can be triggered by a place, a smell, even a picture. For recovering drug addicts, such memory associations can increase vulnerability to relapse. Now researchers at the Florida campus of the Scripps Research Institute have found a chemical that prevents rats from recalling their drug-associated memories. The study, published online in Biological Psychiatry last fall, is also the first of its kind to disrupt memories without requiring active recollection.

Over the course of six days the rats in this study alternated between one of two chambers. On days one, three and five, the animals were injected with methamphetamine hydrochloride—the street drug known as meth—and placed in one room. On the even-numbered days they received a saline placebo and entered a different chamber.

After two more days, half the rodents were given a choice between the rooms. As expected, they showed a clear preference for the place they visited after receiving meth. The other half of the animals were injected with a solution containing Latrunculin A (LatA). This chemical interferes with actin, a protein known to be involved in memory formation. These animals showed no preference between rooms, even up to a day later: their choices seemed not to be driven by a memory of meth.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Previous research has suggested that drugs of abuse alter the way actin functions, causing it to constantly refresh memories associated with these drugs rather than tucking them away into typical memory storage, which is more inert. As a result of their active status, drug memories might remain susceptible to disruption long after their initial formation.

The idea that drug memories might differ in this way is relatively new, so the researchers double-checked this understanding by testing whether LatA could affect food associations. The rats underwent a similar regimen to create a mental link between food and environment. LatA injections had no effect on the animals' reactions to the different chambers, meaning it left the food associations intact.

“The claim that you have an active [actin process] that can maintain the memory days later is really remarkable,” says Gary Lynch, a professor of psychiatry and human behavior at the University of California, Irvine. The next step is to find out what other types of memories—if any—share this property, so that we know exactly what kinds of recall this treatment can target, he says.

Courtney Miller, a co-author of the study and a neurobiologist at Scripps, points out that the technique's limited usefulness helps to alleviate ethical concerns about memory alteration. “You actually couldn't take our discovery and erase a run-of-the-mill memory in the brain, because it simply doesn't work. You can only actually get rid of these drug-associated memories.” Miller emphasizes that the idea behind this research is to give those affected by drug addiction “a fighting chance to stay clean.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe