Menstrual Cycle “on a Chip” Offers a New Window into Female Physiology

Researchers have completed the first laboratory model of the human female reproductive cycle 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The exquisite hormonal signaling that drives the female reproductive system cannot be modeled in a flat petri dish. Scrambling to address history's long dearth of research in women's health and physiology, scientists have now created the first “organ on a chip” model that functionally re-creates the female menstrual cycle. This 3-D system may help scientists understand some causes of recurrent miscarriages and could fuel new studies into birth control and drug development in other areas. Fertility experts hope they might eventually be able to place a sample of an individual woman's cells in such a model and thereby determine the best treatment.

A team led by Northwestern University obstetrics and gynecology professor Teresa K. Woodruff grew human and mouse cells from several reproductive organs in a network of tiny, interconnected cubes. Tubes, valves and pumps pushed air and fluids through the system, mimicking the body's natural circulation. Cells that would die in a petri dish stayed alive for a standard 28-day reproductive cycle.

The researchers jump-started the system's chemical communications with an injection of pituitary hormone. In response, the cells secreted levels of estrogen and progesterone found in a typical menstrual cycle—including during ovulation—replicating the signaling that occurs among different female reproductive organs. The team was also able to simulate hormone activity that takes place shortly after conception, creating a tool that could yield insight into maintaining a successful pregnancy. The research was described earlier this year in Nature Communications.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The system comprises mouse ovarian cells (which produce the same hormones as human ovaries), along with human cells from the fallopian tube, endometrium and cervix. Human liver cells are also included because the organ breaks down many drugs. The work builds on numerous earlier organ-on-a-chip studies that explored ways to model the human body.

The new system is still far from a perfect stand-in for female anatomy: It lacks both the placenta, which is key to supporting pregnancy, and the inflammatory system. Nor can it address how early toxic exposure may affect reproductive health, says Kevin G. Osteen, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, who was not involved in the study. But Woodruff says that her team's work will enable new studies on a wide range of conditions, among them cervical diseases, that cannot be modeled in rodents because of cellular differences.

Dina Fine Maron, formerly an associate editor at Scientific American, is now a wildlife trade investigative reporter at National Geographic.

More by Dina Fine Maron
Scientific American Magazine Vol 316 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Menstrual Cycle 'on a Chip'” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 316 No. 6 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0617-16b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe