New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mercury Rising

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Pockmarked Mercury may superficially look like Earth’s moon, but close-up images show that it is anything but moonlike. NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft transmitted these and other images during its first flyby of the scorched planet on January 14. Scientists last saw such detail when Mariner 10 zipped past 33 years ago, and thanks to better equipment and different lighting angles, MESSENGER has gleaned new information.

Equipped with 11 color filters, MESSENGER’s eyes can see beyond what human vision can detect. In the false-color photograph, constructed from three different color-filtered images, younger craters—those no more than 500 million years old—reveal themselves with a faint bluish tinge. The craft has also spied many new “scarps,” or faults, extending hundreds of kilometers. Such a scarp runs vertically along the right edge of the image (bottom), which encompasses a horizontal extent of about 200 kilometers. Scarps probably formed when Mercury’s interior cooled and the planet shrunk, cracking the surface.

MESSENGER—which stands for Mercury surface, space environment, geochemistry, and ranging—also determined that Mercury’s giant Caloris basin, among the biggest impact craters in the solar system, spans 1,500 kilometers—nearly one third of the planet’s diameter and 200 kilometers more than previous estimates. Inside the basin and unseen by Mariner 10 is a structure scientists are calling “the spider”—made of troughs radiating outward that probably mark the areas where the basin floor broke apart after its formation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The craft will revisit Mercury this October and again in September 2009 before settling into an orbit around the planet in March 2011. It will continue to snap pictures and laser-map the topography, as well as take readings of the planet’s magnetosphere.

Philip Yam is the managing editor of ScientificAmerican.com, responsible for the overall news content online. He began working at the magazine in 1989, first as a copyeditor and then as a features editor specializing in physics. He is the author of The Pathological Protein: Mad Cow, Chronic Wasting and Other Prion Diseases.

More by Philip Yam
Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Mercury Rising” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 4 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042008-1qyv3skSwYeVJbHHdJku4d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe