New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

MERS Vaccine Protects Camels, Which Is Good for People

The vaccine reduces the amount of the virus found in the camels infected with the disease

dromedary camel

Skafrica via ©iStock

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A vaccine that protects against the virus that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) has been shown to be effective in camels, a new study finds.

The vaccine, which was developed by German scientists, reduces the amount of the virus found in the camels infected with the disease, according to the study.

Camels are considered the primary host for the virus, said the study, published today (Dec. 17) in the journal Science. Humans can catch the disease by coming in contact with a sick camel, the researchers wrote. To date, there have been more than 1,600 cases of MERS in 26 countries since the disease first emerged in 2012, according the World Health Organization. Among these cases, nearly 600 people have died from MERS. [8 Things You Should Know About MERS]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An earlier study found that the majority of camels in Saudi Arabia, where the virus was first identified, had been infected with the MERS virus. 

Vaccinating camels against the virus might reduce its spread from camels to humans, the researchers wrote in their study. As with humans, camels sick with MERS develop upper respiratory symptoms.

In the study, the researchers gave four camels the vaccine using a nasal spray, while four other camels received a placebo. Three weeks later, all of the camels were given the MERS virus.

Eight to 10 days later, the camels who received the placebo spray were plagued with runny noses, but the vaccinated camels were not, the study said.

The researchers also tested samples taken from the camels' respiratory tracts for the presence of the virus. Results showed that the levels were significantly reduced in the camels that had been vaccinated compared with the camels in the placebo group, the study said.

The researchers noted that the vaccine also protects the camels from the related virus that causes camelpox, which is similar to smallpox in humans and can be deadly in the animals.

It's unclear at this point if the same vaccine used in the camels would be effective in humans; however, clinical trials may be on the horizon, the researchers said. 

Copyright 2015 LiveScience, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe