Messy Reality of Planet Formation Revealed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new analysis of data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope is helping astronomers better understand how planets come together. The findings suggest that the process might be much more chaotic than previously believed. ¿It's a mess out there,¿ remarks team leader George Rieke of the University of Arizona, Tucson. ¿We are seeing that planets have a long, rocky road to go down before they become full grown.¿

Rieke and his colleagues used Spitzer's infrared eyes to study 266 nearby stars of various ages that were between two and three times the size of the sun. The team discovered that 71 of the stars had planet-forming disks surrounding them. ¿We thought young stars, about one million years old, would have larger, brighter disks, and older stars from 10 to 100 million years old would have fainter ones,¿ Rieke explains. That's because astronomers believed that as the planetoids got bigger, fewer collisions took place within the disks. ¿But we found some young stars missing discs and some old stars with massive disks,¿ he says.

The findings suggest planet formation can take up to 10 times longer than previously thought. Rieke notes that huge collisions are necessary to produce the amount of dust seen in the new images and to replenish the material in the disks over the longer time frame. The study results will appear in an upcoming issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe