New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Messy Reality of Planet Formation Revealed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new analysis of data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope is helping astronomers better understand how planets come together. The findings suggest that the process might be much more chaotic than previously believed. ¿It's a mess out there,¿ remarks team leader George Rieke of the University of Arizona, Tucson. ¿We are seeing that planets have a long, rocky road to go down before they become full grown.¿

Rieke and his colleagues used Spitzer's infrared eyes to study 266 nearby stars of various ages that were between two and three times the size of the sun. The team discovered that 71 of the stars had planet-forming disks surrounding them. ¿We thought young stars, about one million years old, would have larger, brighter disks, and older stars from 10 to 100 million years old would have fainter ones,¿ Rieke explains. That's because astronomers believed that as the planetoids got bigger, fewer collisions took place within the disks. ¿But we found some young stars missing discs and some old stars with massive disks,¿ he says.

The findings suggest planet formation can take up to 10 times longer than previously thought. Rieke notes that huge collisions are necessary to produce the amount of dust seen in the new images and to replenish the material in the disks over the longer time frame. The study results will appear in an upcoming issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe