New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Meteorites Paint Picture of a Forever-Frigid Mars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Temperatures on Mars today hover around a chilly -58 degrees Celsius. Some scientists have proposed, however, that the planet could have been balmy in the past, allowing for liquid water and the possibility of life. But the results of a new chemical analysis have dealt a blow to that theory, indicating that the surface temperatures on the Red Planet barely rose above freezing in the past several billion years.

David L. Shuster, now at the Berkeley Geochronology Center, and Benjamin P. Weiss of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology analyzed two of the seven so-called nakhlite meteorites from the Red Planet in addition to the well-studied ALH84001 Martian meteorite. They first calculated the maximum temperatures the samples were exposed to and determined that ALH84001 may have neared 340 degrees C when it was ejected from the planet and that the nakhlites could have reached about 100 degrees C when they were thrown off 11 million years ago. Next the team measured the amount of argon present in the samples and modeled how the chemical diffused out of the rocks--a property that is temperature dependent--over their entire history. "The small amount of argon loss that has apparently taken place in these meteorites is remarkable," Shuster says. "Any way we look at it, these rocks have been cold for a very long time." The thermal history that the meteorites reveal for Mars is remarkably different from that of our own planet. "On Earth, you couldn't find a single rock that has been below even room temperature for that long," he adds.

Although the findings indicate that the Red Planet has been in a near deep freeze for most of its history, they do not rule out the presence of liquid water entirely. "Our research doesn't mean that there weren't pockets of isolated water in geothermal springs for long periods of time," Shuster explains, "but suggests instead that there haven't been large areas of free standing water for four billion years." In addition, Weiss notes that if the liquid responsible for carving the observed gullies and trenches on the Red Planet was brine that was particularly salty or acidic--two properties that depress the melting point--then it could continue to flow at temperatures as low as around -50 degrees C.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe