Meth-Head Snails' Enhanced Memories Offer Clue to Why Addiction Is Hard to Control

Memories formed by snails under the influence of methamphetamine were stronger than those formed under drug-free conditions, suggesting that mental associations are powerful drivers of compulsive drug use

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Can aquatic snails better remember lessons learned when they are hopped up on methamphetamine? Barbara Sorg of Washington State University in Pullman teamed up with Ken Lukowiak of the University of Calgary Medicine to see if working with snails might provide clues as to why drug memories are so strong that they seem to draw addicts back into repetitive use and addiction.

The team experimented with so-called great pond snails, Lymnaea stagnalis. According to Lukowiak, the snails breathe through their skin when oxygen levels in the water are high, but when oxygen levels drop the snails extend breathing tubes above the water's surface to supplement their intake. Although humans have around 50 billion neurons in the brain devoted to memory and snails have only 20,000, the mechanisms are similar. According to Lukowiak, "Mother Nature is very conservative. Anything that works, she tends to repeat in other organisms even if highly more complex."

The team trained the snails to keep their breathing tubes closed, despite low oxygen levels, by poking them with a stick whenever they raised their tubes above the water level. Two training sessions of about an hour each were necessary for a snail to recall anything beyond 24 hours. So the team of scientists tested the snails to see if methamphetamines might heighten snail recall. Lacing the pond water with crystal meth, they repeated the lessons. When they tested the snails 24 hours later, the snails didn't seem to recall their lessons. But when they put methamphetamine in the water for the recall test, the snails performed exceptionally well. According to Lukowiak, "Only one training session was necessary to initiate long-lasting memory, whereas more typically the snail would need two or three to demonstrate similar recall."

Even doses of methamphetamine administered hours before training seemed to enhance memory, the team reported in the May 28 issue of the Journal of Experimental Biology. Sorg thinks this may demonstrate why it is so difficult for meth addicts to stay off drugs when they initiate memories of the "high" experience, either by using methamphetamine again or just putting themselves back in the environment where those memories were formed. The team also had difficulty negating or masking the lesson that drug-influenced snails learned. Sorg refers to strong drug-induced memories as pathological memories, "because they can initiate drug use even if the addict is determined not to repeat the behavior again."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe