The Age of Discovery: What Would You Study If You Lived Forever? [Poll]

Leading scientists answer that question in Scientific American. Cast your vote for the best proposal and suggest ideas of your own

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Many research questions cannot be answered in the course of a single lifetime. Davide Castelvecchi, a contributing editor for Scientific American, has long-wondered what scientists would study if they could live for hundreds or thousands of years—or even indefinitely. Recently he put the question to leading investigators in their fields, reporting on their replies in "Questions for the Next Million Years," in our September 2012 issue.

A summary of the replies appears below. Which idea do you like best? Vote for one below. You can compare your answer with those of other voters here.

We'd also like to hear your ideas for other studies that would need centuries or more to carry out. Post your thoughts in the comments section below.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientific American Magazine Vol 307 Issue 3This article was published with the title “The Age of Discovery: What Would You Study If You Lived Forever? [Poll]” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 307 No. 3 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican092012-2OYXk8RGyGa5LLW6FJM9y4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe