New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Methuselahs' Children Have Better Heart Health

The offspring of the long-lived may get a dose of good genes, but the rest of us can look to help from drugs and diet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Children of long-lived parents have a lower-than-average risk of heart disease in middle age, according to the latest results from a decades-long study tracking the heart health of residents of Framingham, Mass. Researchers found that if one or both of a person's parents survived to the ripe old age of 85, then that lucky individual could expect lower blood pressure and cholesterol—two major risk factors for heart disease, the nation's number one killer.

Prior studies have found that centenarians tend to have long-lived children with less heart disease and diabetes. But the Framingham study sheds light on those findings, because researchers are certain of the parents' ages at the time of their deaths and directly measured the vital signs of their offspring every four to eight years, says study director Daniel Levy, a cardiologist at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in Bethesda, Md.

Levy and his colleagues focused on 1,697 participants whose parents were also part of the Framingham Heart Study when it began in 1948. These participants' parents were all born long enough ago to have reached age 85. The researchers divided the offspring into three categories based on whether they had one, two or zero parents who survived to age 85.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Those whose parents made it to 85 scored higher on a variety of factors, including a combined measure of heart health called the Framingham risk score, which takes into account age, cholesterol, blood pressure, hypertension and cigarette smoking.

For example, only 13 percent of subjects with two surviving parents suffered from hypertension, or chronically high blood pressure, compared with 17 percent of those with one long-lived parent and nearly 22 percent of those with two shorter-lived parents. And the more long-lived the parents, the fewer of the offspring smoked, at least in men.

The finding, reported this week in the Archives of Internal Medicine, suggests that the long-lived parents had similarly low risk factors for heart disease, Levy says. "No doubt some of the familial clustering of longevity is a lifestyle phenomenon," he says, but "it's certainly pointing to some genetic component," too. He notes, for example, that roughly 50 percent of the variation in people's blood pressure values seems derive from genetics.

And what about people whose parents do not attain Methuselah status? No need to fret. "Even for those of us who chose our parents unwisely," Levy quips, "there's still a great deal we can do to modify our destiny." The study, he says, "points to those risk factors that just happen to be modifiable" through diet and drugs. "We know we can modify the risk factors, and we know those risk factors correlate with a long life."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe