Microscope on a Dime

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A lensless microscope the size of a dime might quickly and cheaply scan blood for tumor cells and parasites. In the device created by Changhuei Yang and his team at the California Institute of Technology, light shines on a liquid sample flowing through a narrow channel, below which are one-micron-wide apertures spaced 10 microns apart. The light shines through the holes onto a semiconductor chip studded with sensor pixels similar to those in digital cameras. Objects that float over the apertures block some of the incoming light received by the pixels, which construct an image of the object based on the variations in light intensity. Details down to 0.8 to 0.9 micron are apparent. (Cancer cells typically measure 15 to 30 microns.) With a chip-based microscope, “there's no lens to break,” says Yang, who was inspired by “floaters,” the clumps of dead cells and other debris in the eye. Better yet, they cost about $10 a pop.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 299 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Microscope on a Dime” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 299 No. 4 (), p. 36
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1008-36d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe