Microsoft's tablet OS isn't liked but lives on

Samsung ATIV Tab, Windows RT version: Samsung has canceled sales of Windows RT tablets in key markets. (Credit: Samsung) OK, we know Microsoft's tablet OS isn't popular.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

OK, we know Microsoft's tablet OS isn't popular. So, what's next?

First, a look at the short, checkered past of RT, which rolled out on October 26, 2012.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That's not a complete history, but you get the idea. As of today, Microsoft is pretty much the sole survivor among the big players. (Though old RT devices are still being sold, like Dell's XPS 10 tablet announced way back in August 2012 and Acer tablets, among others.)

What happens now? The company said on Friday that it was committed to ARM. (While that statement made no mention of a commitment to RT, Microsoft has a history of referring to RT as Windows on ARM or WOA.)

I've been told that Microsoft is planning a 7.5-inch tablet. Because of its small size, that's a good candidate for ARM with integrated 4G/3G.

The bigger point is, Microsoft believes in ARM. Every best-selling tablet on the planet today runs on ARM. So, you can't blame Microsoft for thinking something like: We can't afford not to run a tablet on ARM. That's pretty much what Corporate Vice President Michael Angiulo said back in March.

IDC has suggested that Microsoft collapse Windows Phone (which also runs on ARM) and RT into one platform, making it more like Apple's iOS.

Whatever happens, it's probably a good opportunity for readers to chime in. I'm guessing Microsoft is all ears.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe