Milky Way¿s Oldest Stars May Be Galactic Intruders

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Received astronomical wisdom holds that the Milky Way formed from a slowly twirling, homogeneous body of gas that collapsed into a star-studded pancake. According to this so-called monolithic model, stellar aggregations known as globular clusters were the first objects to take shape, arising from condensing gas in the disc¿s "spherical halo" in the final moments of the collapse. Consequently, most of the ancient clusters reside in the halo, and their stars contain less metal than younger ones do because they formed when the interstellar medium was metal-poor. The monolithic model predicts that the clusters should vary continuously in properties such as age and metallicity according to their distance from the galactic center. Strangely, however, observations of the star clumps indicate that they instead fall into two distinct types. New findings may explain this dichotomy. Korean astronomers writing in the current issue of the journal Science have found evidence that some members of one kind of cluster may actually hail from a galaxy other than our own.

The results fit neatly with a growing body of evidence that stellar strangers abound in the Milky Way. Indeed, previous work has suggested that a number of globular clusters originated in other galaxies and were eventually absorbed by ours. But there has been no evidence that the most metal-poor clusters (and therefore supposedly the oldest) share that history. Suk-Jin Yoon and Young-Wook Lee of Seoul¿s Yonsei University thus focused on these lowest metallicity aggregates, otherwise known as group II-b. With the help of computer models, the team used the colors of certain stars to determine the ages of clusters in this group and those in a group characterized by intermediate metal abundance. Surprisingly, the group II-b clusters turned out to in fact be younger than their more metal-rich counterparts.

Furthermore, the researchers found that most II-b clusters lie in the same plane as two of our galactic neighbors: the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and the Draco dwarf galaxy. This unusual arrangement, along with hints that the II-b assemblages have an orbit similar to that of the LMC, suggests that they were forged in one of the nearby galaxies and only later acquired by the Milky Way. (Exactly when this celestial kidnapping might have occurred remains unknown.) Only more data will enable astronomers to pinpoint which of the Milky Way¿s resident globular clusters are natives and which are aliens. But for now, as Christine Clement of the University of Toronto says in an accompanying commentary, "evidence is mounting that the formation of our galaxy was less straightforward than [the monolithic model] suggests."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe