New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

MIND Reviews: Pieces of Light

Books and recommendations from Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Pieces of Light: How the New Science of Memory Illuminates the Stories We Tell about Our Pasts
Charles Fernyhough
HarperCollins, 2013 ($26.99)

Andy Warhol had an unusual grooming habit. The artist and pop culture icon liked to wear the same cologne for three months, then store the bottle and never use it again. He hoped to associate the scents with events in a certain time period, so that sniffing the bottles later might evoke those memories.

Most of us know from experience how evocative smells can be and how they can make us recall something, often from early childhood. Unlike Warhol, most people make associations unconsciously, and retrieval occurs automatically. Warhol's “scent museum” is one of the many fascinating stories in Pieces of Light, by writer and psychologist Fernyhough.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


For Fernyhough, our memories are basically stories. We use them to construct the narratives of our lives and those of loved ones we have lost. Often, however, the tales we tell ourselves do not match reality but are subtly altered every time we recollect them. Here Fernyhough examines his personal stories, stepping back into time to trace the memories he thought were reliable. He seamlessly intersperses the personal aspects of this journey with descriptions of cutting-edge research into spatial navigation and memory manipulation, as well as new ideas about how memory works.

For instance, when Fernyhough revisits Cambridge, England, where he studied in the 1980s, he thinks he will be able to find his way around. Yet he quickly gets lost. He experiences a kind of amnesia in which his mental maps have become blurred over time. He also showcases how unreliable autobiographical memory can be. Fernyhough finds that his memories have been tainted by popular clichés of the famous city.

Although most people think that memory works like a DVD, recording events as they happened, Fernyhough's examples help to clarify that this is not the case. He suggests that memory may have evolved not to recall the past but to help predict the future. In other words, we use fragments of memories to simulate upcoming events to figure out the best course of action.

Throughout, the author uses his remarkable storytelling skills to examine memory, leaving us in no doubt that it is an active, ongoing process, incorporating not only what happened then but also who we are now and who we may become.

SA Mind Vol 24 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Grasping Our Past” in SA Mind Vol. 24 No. 2 (), p. 75
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0513-75b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe