New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

MIND Reviews: Blindspot

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People
Mahzarin R. Banaji Anthony G. Greenwald
Delacorte Press, 2013 ($27)

When journalist Brent Staples walks down the street, he whistles classical music. Staples, who is African-American, does not do this to share his love of Mozart. Rather he wants to ease the fears of white pedestrians who might not realize how nervous they feel when passing a black man.

As psychologists Banaji and Greenwald discuss in Blindspot, Staples is attempting to counteract unconscious bias. Our social and cultural surroundings influence these attitudes in ways we may not notice. They argue that forming implicit biases is an innate, often helpful, ability that allows us to distinguish friend from foe and to find our place in a complex social world. Psychologists study this phenomenon using tests that force us to make rapid associations. The speed with which we connect words from two categories, such as “good” and “thin” or “good” and “fat,” reveals our underlying preferences. One study showed, surprisingly, that ambitious, professional women often prefer a male boss, for instance, and another found that people who proclaim the earth is flat unconsciously accept that it is round.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Implicit biases influence our behavior in complex and often subtle ways. A doctor may inadvertently give a patient special treatment because the patient is a professor at Yale. Or a white philanthropist who sees himself as open-minded may still contribute to racial inequality by donating to charities that primarily support white people.

The book's main shortcoming is the absence of nuanced brain-based explanations for how implicit biases form. The authors only briefly describe how the same neural networks become active in our brain's decision-making center when we consider our own actions and those of individuals similar to ourselves. In addition, they—unwilling to impose values on their readers—offer minimal advice to head off implicit racism or sexism.

Despite these gaps, Blindspot successfully reveals how our unconscious minds influence our beliefs and behaviors and remind us to think twice about our instinctive reactions and to acknowledge how bias might creep into our lives.

Daisy Yuhas is the former editor of Scientific American's Mind Matters. A freelance science journalist, Yuhas is author of the Kids Field Guide to Birds (Cool Springs Press, 2024).

More by Daisy Yuhas
SA Mind Vol 23 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Type Set” in SA Mind Vol. 23 No. 6 (), p. 69
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0113-69a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe