New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

MIND Reviews: Drunk Tank Pink

Books and recommendations from Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Drunk Tank Pink: And Other Unexpected Forces That Shape How We Think, Feel, and Behave
Adam Alter
Penguin Press, 2013 ($20)

At the 2004 Summer Olympics, researchers asked six athletes in different sports to wear red uniforms instead of their usual more subdued colors. All of them won gold. Although the color red, associated with sex, dominance and aggression, did not convey magical powers, it may have provided subconscious cues to the athletes and their opponents that swayed the outcome of the competition.

In his new book, social psychologist Alter reveals how seemingly innocuous things, such as colors, symbols, even names, influence how we think and behave. To prove his point, Alter starts with work that began in the 1970s, which showed how pink walls in confined spaces, jails and locker rooms changed men's behavior—calming those prone to violence, even decreasing their strength.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Subtle changes to the environment can also tweak people's behavior. In one study, researchers showed 300 students the Apple or IBM logos at 77 frames per second, too fast for humans to see or process consciously. Participants exposed to the Apple but not the IBM logo performed much better on a subsequent creativity test in which they were asked to find alternative uses for a paper clip. The study revealed that subliminal exposure to a powerful cultural symbol can be enough to prompt people to think outside the box.

Changes to our social scene can also have similar effects. For instance, OPower, an energy company, pits neighbor against neighbor in a friendly game to reduce electricity use. It awards digital smiley faces to clients who conserve more than their neighbors. The system works: since its launch, the firm has accumulated savings of one billion kilowatt-hours from the U.S. electrical grid.

Competing with others does not always bring out our best, however. Pressure from opponents often makes people perform poorly, like when taking a test alongside your peers.

By offering a peek into human perception, Drunk Tank Pink may help us reevaluate our surroundings, making us aware of small cues that may direct our thoughts.

SA Mind Vol 24 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Shaping Perception” in SA Mind Vol. 24 No. 2 (), p. 75
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0513-75a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe