MIND Reviews: The Linguists

Recommendations from Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Linguists
Order the DVD at www.thelinguists.com

There are 7,000 languages in the world—and one dies every two weeks. With it goes cultural knowledge built for generations as well as an irreplaceable piece of the puzzle that is
the human brain’s affinity for words. In an effort to record the most endangered languages before they disappear, Swarthmore College ethnographer David Harrison and linguist Greg Anderson of the Living Tongues Institute for Endangered Languages in Salem, Ore., embarked on a journey around the world. The Linguists chronicles their adventures and challenges, many fit for Indiana Jones. Some of the most nerve-wracking and humorous moments of the documentary happen when the scientists try to communicate with the surviving elderly speakers: one of the last 25 people who speak Chulym in Siberia is nearly deaf; another alternates between swearing at the researchers and confessing her love for them.

When people stop speaking in their native tongue, we miss out on unique insights into the diverse ways the brain can work. Anderson and Harrison come across an unknown numerical system near its death in rural India, and their surprise and joy at the discovery are infectious. Harrison asks Orenchu Gomango to count in his native language, Sora. “When he said 13,” Harrison explains, “he repeated the word we had just heard for 12 and added the word ‘one’ to it.” Unlike English, which uses 10 as a base, Sora appears to use 12 as its base. Until Gomango counts to 30, which translates to 20–10. “Now he’s using 12 and 20 as a base. So, then, as he counts higher, which one is he gonna use? It turns out he’s going to use both of them. So you get to 32, and that is 20–12.” The linguists determine that the Sora word for 93, which translates to 4–20–12–1, is one of the most complicated numbers we might ever see in a language.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Back in Siberia, the researchers work with local children to create a storybook, the first book ever published in Chulym. “It’s hard to really explain the satisfaction you can have watching people reconnect in essence with their history,” Anderson says. But we sense he has little time to enjoy this small success. By the end of the film, we learn that half the Chulym speakers Anderson and Harrison interviewed have already passed away.  

SA Mind Vol 20 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Reviews and Recommendations” in SA Mind Vol. 20 No. 2 (), p. 69
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican042009-3yI5S279ehz4pOgg82psWO

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe