New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Mineral Found in Lunar Meteorite Hints at Hidden Moon Water

Moganite within a moon rock found in northwest Africa suggests a treasure trove of ice in the lunar subsurface

moon water map

This partial mineralogical map of the moon’s surface, provided in 2009 by a NASA instrument on an Indian lunar orbiter, revealed the presence of water-rich minerals (blue) around the moon’s high latitudes. Such maps, however, only survey the topmost regions of the lunar surface. Now, a new study of a lunar meteorite offers tantalizing evidence for the existence of water ice deeper down.

A mineral that requires the presence of water to form has been discovered in a lunar meteorite, a new study reports.

The find suggests that hidden caches of water ice potentially useful for human exploration might be hidden under the surface of the moon, study team members said. 

A team of Japanese scientists led by Masahiro Kayama from the Department of Earth and Planetary Materials Science at Tohoku University found the mineral, called moganite, in a lunar meteorite discovered in a desert in northwest Africa.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Moganite, a crystal of silicon dioxide similar to quartz, is known to form on Earth in specific circumstances in sedimentary settings from alkaline fluids. It has never before been detected in samples of lunar rock.

Kayama and his team believe the mineral formed on the surface of the moon in the area called Procellarum Terrane, as water originally present in lunar dirt evaporated due to exposure to strong sunlight. According to Kayama, there is a good reason to believe that, deeper under the lunar surface, crystals of water ice could be abundant, protected from the harsh solar rays.

“For the first time, we can prove that there is water ice in the lunar material,” Kayama told Space.com. “In a moganite, there is less water, because moganite forms from the evaporation of water. That’s the case on the surface of the moon. But in the subsurface, much water remains as ice, because it’s protected from the sunlight.”

Scientists already knew that there’s water on the moon. For example, NASA’s Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite detected the stuffin a shadowed crater near the moon’s south pole. And India’s probe Chandrayaan-1 recorded evidence of water in the thin atmosphere above the moon’s surface. 

But, according to Kayama, there has been no evidence so far of the presence of water in the subsurface at mid and lower latitudes. 

“Many people think that remote-sensing spacecraft only found the evidence of water around the poles simply because we can’t see under the surface below a few millimeters,” Kayama said. “This is the first insight into water in the subsurface zone.”

The researchers estimate that the water content in the lunar soil under the surface could be up to 0.6 percent. If that’s right, future moon pioneers could theoretically extract about 1.6 gallons of water per 36 cubic feet (6 liters per cubic meter) of lunar rock, Kayama said.

“This value means that water is very abundant,” he said. “It would be enough for future astronauts and people that could perhaps live on the moon in the future to extract enough water to cover their needs.” 

Kayama said that the widespread presence of water ice under the surface of the moon in other areas than just the poles would mean future explorers would have easier access to the resource, which could also be used to make rocket fuel for missions to asteroids and other planets.

“We wouldn’t need to bring all the water for drinking and the fuel to return to Earth or to travel to Mars, for example, with us from Earth,” Kayama said. “If water is abundant in the lunar subsurface, we can easily use it.”

Kayama and his colleagues analyzed 14 lunar meteorites using sophisticated methods, including micro-Raman spectroscopy and electron microscopy. They found moganite in only one of those samples. 

However, they said, concentrations of the mineral suggest that it was unlikely to have formed when the meteorite was already lying in the African desert, exposed to terrestrial weather. 

“Moganite formation as a result of terrestrial weathering can be excluded, because this scenario would imply a wide distribution of moganite in the sands of the hot desert where the meteorites were found,” the researchers wrote in the new study, which was published online today (May 2) in the journal Science Advances. “This case has not been reported. Moganite is readily and completely lost via water alteration at ambient pressure.” 

Kayama hopes that Japan’s space agency JAXA will go ahead with plans to launch a lunar sample-return mission in the future, which would allow researchers to attempt to detect moganite in other lunar rocks.

Copyright 2018 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe