Minerals May Explain Life's Handedness

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One peculiarity of our world is that certain biological molecules are handed¿meaning that only one of two possible mirror-image configurations occur in living things. Sugars, for instance, tend to be right-handed, whereas the amino acids are lefties. Now Robert M. Hazen and his colleagues are presenting strong evidence to support an intriguing explanation in today's Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. According to their experiments, handedness may have resulted from the way that primordial biochemicals sloshed over simple rock crystals billions of years ago.

The scientists worked with calcite (CaCO3), which has the same composition as chalk and marble and was one of the most abundant minerals in our planet's earliest days. Calcite crystals are also formed such that different facets have mirror-image atomic-scale structures. When the researchers dunked mineral samples in solutions containing both left- and right-handed versions of the amino acid aspartic acid, they discovered that the different versions preferentially stuck to different facets of the calcite crystals.

Hazen and his colleagues note that other minerals have the potential for sorting handed molecules. And in the April 2001 issue of Scientific American, Hazen described other ways in which minerals could have helped jump-start life on Earth. "Minerals could have served at least five significant functions," he wrote, "from passive props to active players, in life-inducing chemical reactions." Apart from selecting for handedness, Hazen suggests that minerals may have provided support and scaffolding for growing chains of molecules, and catalyzed or fueled biochemical reaction

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe